The No. 1 cause of most serious truck accidents is unsafe and careless driving. Although commercial truck drivers are supposed to be “the professionals,” they frequently fall short of their duties – both the common responsibility to use reasonable care and the statutory/regulatory rules established for operation of machines this massive and potentially lethal.
Unsafe and careless driving is an issue for all road users, but when it’s the truckers who are irresponsible, it has an outsized impact for everyone else.
Given that fatal crashes involving large trucks have increased by 12 percent over the last decade (according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration), it’s an issue that has caught the attention of Massachusetts public safety officials as well as Boston truck accident attorneys at Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers. We recognize these cases are high stakes, but also how difficult it can be to get a fair shake from these motor carriers – many of whom fight tooth-and-nail to deny liability or to substantially reduce the amount of damages they’re legally compelled to pay. While a truck driver’s unsafe driving doesn’t automatically mean the motor carrier was negligent too (though well-established precedent in Massachusetts and beyond is that carriers-lessees are vicariously liable for negligent truck drivers), often there is evidence that carriers too breached their duty of care.
Some examples include:
Many instances of unsafe or careless driving can be traced back to one of these issues as well.
What is Considered Unsafe or Careless Driving for Massachusetts Truck Drivers?Like all motorists, truck drivers accept the responsibility to abide local ordinances and state traffic laws such as refraining from impaired driving and traveling at safe speeds. But in many respects, truck drivers are held to higher standards than those operating passenger cars.
Specifically 49 CFR § 392.2 states that while every commercial vehicle must be operated in accordance with laws, ordinances and regulations of the respective jurisdiction, provisions of federal law, set and enforced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, may be more strict, imposing a higher standard of care than state/local laws. In that case, it’s the FMCSA rules with which the commercial driver must comply.
Examples of unsafe or careless driving that commonly result in trucking accidents (with laws pertaining to several specifically denote commercial drivers being held to a higher standard) include the following:
As these examples reveal, negligence in these cases is most commonly (but not always) established by truck accident injury attorneys pointing to an operator’s breach of the state and federal law or regulatory requirements.
The American Transportation Research Institute revealed that a truck driver with prior citations for infractions such as improper merging, failure to yield, and/or failure to signal, increased his/her chances of a traffic crash by 80 to 115 percent. Truckers who violate these rules of the road are, by definition, driving unsafely. The Massachusetts General Law on reckless and negligent driving, MGL 90 § 24, also stipulates that if someone operates a vehicle in such a way that is reckless or negligent or endangers the lives of others, they can also be charged with a crime.
However, as Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers can explain, the state does not need to prove a truck driver guilty of a criminal traffic offense in order for an injured individual to be able to hold the driver liable for damages in civil court. Still, state and federal traffic laws are instructive in these cases because a truck driver who breaks traffic laws also breaches their common law duty to use reasonable care. If this breach plays a causal role in a crash, that driver can be deemed negligent (or at least partially so), which can mean legal responsibility to pay monetary damages to anyone hurt as a result.
Who Pays for Unsafe, Careless Driving Truck Accidents?When a trucker drives unsafely or carelessly, they aren’t the only ones who can be held liable for it. In some cases, multiple parties can be held responsible. If that driver is an employee, his/her employer can be deemed responsible for any acts that took place in the course and scope of employment – regardless of whether the company itself was negligent.
It’s also possible in these cases that commercial motor carriers and shippers may be held liable too, depending on the circumstances.
If the person who was hurt was contributorily negligent per MGL 231 § 85, the defendant can argue comparative fault. If successful, the amount the injured driver receives in damages can be reduced significantly or even eliminated entirely if the individual is more than 50% at fault.
Commercial motor vehicles are required by the FMCSA to carry minimum insurance levels, depending on their weight, size and type of cargo. Non-hazardous freight (no passengers) under 10,001 pounds are required to carry at least $300,000 in coverage. Other non-passenger truck minimum coverage is somewhere between $750,000 and $5 million. Passenger-carrying commercial carriers are required to carry at least $1.5 million (15 or fewer passengers) or $5 million (16 or more passengers) in insurance coverage.
Truck drivers, motor carriers and lessor-lessees of trucks can all be held liable in catastrophic injury truck accidents.
Because these cases are so high stakes, most trucking companies already have the protocol in place to launch immediate investigations to gather evidence that will reflect in their favor. To bolster your chances of full and fair compensation, contact our experienced accident attorneys today.
Contact Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers today for a free and confidential consultation.
Call (617) 777-7777 – NO FEE UNLESS SUCCESSFUL